Journal of Advanced Analytics in Healthcare Management
Publishing Pioneering Research in Healthcare Analytics and Data-Driven Decision Making
Peer Review Policy
The Journal of Advanced Analytics in Healthcare Management employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to eliminate bias in evaluation.
| Reviewer Criteria | Evaluation Aspects |
|---|---|
| Specialization in Healthcare Analytics | Relevance, Clarity, Innovation |
| Research Proficiency | Significance, Methodology, Impact on Healthcare |
Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two experts, selected based on their specialized knowledge, research experience, and publication record. Reviewers evaluate submissions for originality, significance, and methodological rigor, providing constructive recommendations to authors.
Editorial Oversight
The Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors oversee the review process, ensuring constructive feedback and making final publication decisions based on reviewers’ recommendations.
Ethical Standards
- • Reviewer Ethics: Reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest, maintain confidentiality, and provide fair and unbiased feedback.
- • Author Responsibility: Authors must submit accurate data, properly acknowledge previous work, and adhere to ethical research practices in healthcare analytics.
Interested in Submitting Your Research?
Contribute to the Journal of Advanced Analytics in Healthcare Management and advance the field of healthcare data science.
Submit Your Manuscript