• The International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing (IJIAC) follows a rigorous peer review policy to ensure the quality and validity of the articles published in the journal. All submitted manuscripts are subject to a double-blind peer review process, where both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
  • The review process is conducted by at least two independent experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, research experience, and publication record. They are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, significance, relevance to the journal's scope, clarity, and methodology. Reviewers are also asked to provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.
  • The Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors oversee the review process and make the final decision on whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript based on the reviewers' recommendations. The editorial team is committed to ensuring a fair and unbiased review process and to providing timely and constructive feedback to the authors.
  • Authors are given the opportunity to respond to the reviewers' comments and make revisions to their manuscript accordingly. The revised manuscript is then re-evaluated by the original reviewers or new reviewers, and a final decision is made based on their feedback.
  • IJIAC is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in the peer review process. Reviewers are expected to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, maintain confidentiality, and provide unbiased and constructive feedback. Authors are expected to provide accurate and complete information, acknowledge the work of others, and avoid any form of plagiarism or misconduct.

Current Issue

Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing-24-5
View All Issues
Loading...