International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing (IJIAC)
Quality Research Through Rigorous Peer Review and Ethical Standards
Peer Review Policy
The International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing (IJIAC) follows a rigorous double-blind peer review policy, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to maintain an unbiased evaluation process.
| Reviewer Criteria | Evaluation Aspects |
|---|---|
| Expertise in Field | Relevance, Clarity, Originality |
| Research Experience | Significance, Methodology |
Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two experts, chosen based on expertise, research background, and publication history. Reviewers assess manuscripts for originality, relevance, and methodology, offering constructive feedback for authors.
Editorial Oversight
The Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors are responsible for overseeing the review process. They ensure timely, constructive feedback and make the final decision based on reviewer recommendations.
Ethical Standards
- • Reviewer Ethics: Reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest, maintain confidentiality, and provide unbiased feedback.
- • Author Responsibility: Authors must provide accurate data, acknowledge previous work, and adhere to ethical research standards.
Interested in Submitting Your Research?
Join the International Journal of Intelligent Automation and Computing in advancing research in automation and intelligent systems.
Submit Your Manuscript